<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About D&#8217;an time&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24451</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24451</guid>
		<description>Game tonight at 7 vs Philly.
Hope we get a treat!

Happy Halloween.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game tonight at 7 vs Philly.<br />
Hope we get a treat!</p>
<p>Happy Halloween.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Drossman</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24450</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Drossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24450</guid>
		<description>I heard the chant of &quot;We want Steph&quot; but that was coming from a bunch of uneducated basketball fans and not real Knicks fans.  Those same fans, who chanted we want Steph, probably want Isiah Thomas here too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the chant of &#8220;We want Steph&#8221; but that was coming from a bunch of uneducated basketball fans and not real Knicks fans.  Those same fans, who chanted we want Steph, probably want Isiah Thomas here too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelegacy</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24449</link>
		<dc:creator>thelegacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24449</guid>
		<description>would be great if GS threw in Anthony Randolph too lol!!! Damnit, would be nice if the Knicks got the better end of these deals for once... jeez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would be great if GS threw in Anthony Randolph too lol!!! Damnit, would be nice if the Knicks got the better end of these deals for once&#8230; jeez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orange and Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24448</link>
		<dc:creator>Orange and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24448</guid>
		<description>Interesting Take on Marbury on Bloomberg.com

Here&#039;s the Title and Link

Knicks Now Understand the Skill-Talent Debate: Scott Soshnick 

Commentary by Scott Soshnick

Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;refer=columnist_soshnick&amp;sid=ayxukuit_Law

[My Notes: The Author is trying to categorize words but does so incorrectly. 

My take is that Skills can be learned- Lives dead on observation between a shooter and a scorer is instructive. For example the proper mechanics on a jumper, on how to position oneself to rebound, footwork on the pivot, dribbling the basketball. 

Talent is different, to me it is a pot luck sort of thing that some individuals are able to put together and put out better than others. Moreover it consist of at least two-perhaps more-- add on please- abilities. One abilty is the ability to improvize from options within a given set of skillsets. An example would be the scorer who not only possesses the basic skillsets others have-dribbling, shooting, posting up, slashing etc- but is able to weave them and mix and match these different components in a creative way that allows for additional options to exploit with the ball. Jordan, Kobe and our own Crawford anyone. 

Another component of talent is the capacity/ability to be able to improve upon or maximize the effectiveness of a given skillset or set of skillsets. Reggie made an art of working the picks and the catch and shoot as has one of his admirers Rip Hamilton, Olajuwon took footwork in the paint for a big man to a new level with his dreamshake and fade, Jordan mastered the fade away to the discontent of many an adversary, Kareem made that skyhook a thing of beauty. 

That&#039;s my basic take on how I see the skill talent distinction- artisan artist that I was reffering to in a question I posed- stumped- Lives with. 

I believe what the author of this piece on Marbury is speaking to is to the concept of professionalism and maleability &quot;coachability&quot;, which many here and around the vast fanbase of the NBA believe is wilting and at times dissapearing. 

The article talks about Duhon&#039;s maleabilty to adapt and take to his coache&#039;s instruction/guidance. The article also speaks to Duhon&#039;s professionalism in how he goes about approaching what is surely the grind of the NBA season. 

The purported maleability and coachability of Duhon is contrasted with Marbury&#039;s stubborness and obstinence. Murbury no doubt has skills and is very talented but to date most would agree that he has neither been the most coachable nor professional Knick. ] 

Happy Halloween all.

Hope the Knicks trick the Sixers and don&#039;t treat them to a no defensive showing that they, the Sixers, exploit to the Knicks&#039; detriment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Take on Marbury on Bloomberg.com</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the Title and Link</p>
<p>Knicks Now Understand the Skill-Talent Debate: Scott Soshnick </p>
<p>Commentary by Scott Soshnick</p>
<p>Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&#038;refer=columnist_soshnick&#038;sid=ayxukuit_Law" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&#038;refer=columnist_soshnick&#038;sid=ayxukuit_Law</a></p>
<p>[My Notes: The Author is trying to categorize words but does so incorrectly. </p>
<p>My take is that Skills can be learned- Lives dead on observation between a shooter and a scorer is instructive. For example the proper mechanics on a jumper, on how to position oneself to rebound, footwork on the pivot, dribbling the basketball. </p>
<p>Talent is different, to me it is a pot luck sort of thing that some individuals are able to put together and put out better than others. Moreover it consist of at least two-perhaps more-- add on please- abilities. One abilty is the ability to improvize from options within a given set of skillsets. An example would be the scorer who not only possesses the basic skillsets others have-dribbling, shooting, posting up, slashing etc- but is able to weave them and mix and match these different components in a creative way that allows for additional options to exploit with the ball. Jordan, Kobe and our own Crawford anyone. </p>
<p>Another component of talent is the capacity/ability to be able to improve upon or maximize the effectiveness of a given skillset or set of skillsets. Reggie made an art of working the picks and the catch and shoot as has one of his admirers Rip Hamilton, Olajuwon took footwork in the paint for a big man to a new level with his dreamshake and fade, Jordan mastered the fade away to the discontent of many an adversary, Kareem made that skyhook a thing of beauty. </p>
<p>That's my basic take on how I see the skill talent distinction- artisan artist that I was reffering to in a question I posed- stumped- Lives with. </p>
<p>I believe what the author of this piece on Marbury is speaking to is to the concept of professionalism and maleability "coachability", which many here and around the vast fanbase of the NBA believe is wilting and at times dissapearing. </p>
<p>The article talks about Duhon's maleabilty to adapt and take to his coache's instruction/guidance. The article also speaks to Duhon's professionalism in how he goes about approaching what is surely the grind of the NBA season. </p>
<p>The purported maleability and coachability of Duhon is contrasted with Marbury's stubborness and obstinence. Murbury no doubt has skills and is very talented but to date most would agree that he has neither been the most coachable nor professional Knick. ] </p>
<p>Happy Halloween all.</p>
<p>Hope the Knicks trick the Sixers and don&#8217;t treat them to a no defensive showing that they, the Sixers, exploit to the Knicks&#8217; detriment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orange and Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24447</link>
		<dc:creator>Orange and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24447</guid>
		<description>KnicksD

I agree about the duplication factor of what the Warriors are looking at in David lee. But if you think of it in terms of talent flipping Lee playing well in the last year of his contract could provide the Warriors with sign and trade options. 

Paul-bring the-Noize


LMAO!

Nothing but love for ya homie.

DLT seems intent on trading away my man crush, (no homo), Pardy Hardy Mardy Collins.

Yes that would be a favorable trade for the Knicks in terms of getting back a player who is not only a rugged and capable inside scorer but also a player who would likely be a better fit in the smaller more uptempo Knicks. 

I think the Knicks would have to throw in an additional player and a pick. I suppose Roberson or Mardy along with Curry and hopefully not budging on a one but offering a 2nd rounder. That would clear roster space and allow Ewing Jr. a chance to do a redux with flavor. 

Curry&#039;s value is so low right now though, that it&#039;s a buyer&#039;s market on him. I wouldn&#039;t sell the barn yet for Harrington, even though he&#039;ll give the Knicks Depth. 

Next year Steph will definately be out and so will Rose. Curry will have to learn a hard lesson watching his teamate rot, and perhaps if their is an iota of self respect in that lug he&#039;ll work himself into shape and into the rotation to do an exhibition to up his trade value next year. 

Patience I say. 

Though of course Mullin won&#039;t be under contract with the Warriors and a sweet heart deal to GM at MSG might butter some workable trade out for both parties. 

Aight Paulnoize hope to check you out on both sides of the indy blogosphere.

Dalegacy

DVJ reborn. I love your lakers this year though. Bynum is the real deal. He puts Curry to shame rehabing and improving to help take the Lake show back to the title.

Night all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KnicksD</p>
<p>I agree about the duplication factor of what the Warriors are looking at in David lee. But if you think of it in terms of talent flipping Lee playing well in the last year of his contract could provide the Warriors with sign and trade options. </p>
<p>Paul-bring the-Noize</p>
<p>LMAO!</p>
<p>Nothing but love for ya homie.</p>
<p>DLT seems intent on trading away my man crush, (no homo), Pardy Hardy Mardy Collins.</p>
<p>Yes that would be a favorable trade for the Knicks in terms of getting back a player who is not only a rugged and capable inside scorer but also a player who would likely be a better fit in the smaller more uptempo Knicks. </p>
<p>I think the Knicks would have to throw in an additional player and a pick. I suppose Roberson or Mardy along with Curry and hopefully not budging on a one but offering a 2nd rounder. That would clear roster space and allow Ewing Jr. a chance to do a redux with flavor. </p>
<p>Curry&#8217;s value is so low right now though, that it&#8217;s a buyer&#8217;s market on him. I wouldn&#8217;t sell the barn yet for Harrington, even though he&#8217;ll give the Knicks Depth. </p>
<p>Next year Steph will definately be out and so will Rose. Curry will have to learn a hard lesson watching his teamate rot, and perhaps if their is an iota of self respect in that lug he&#8217;ll work himself into shape and into the rotation to do an exhibition to up his trade value next year. </p>
<p>Patience I say. </p>
<p>Though of course Mullin won&#8217;t be under contract with the Warriors and a sweet heart deal to GM at MSG might butter some workable trade out for both parties. </p>
<p>Aight Paulnoize hope to check you out on both sides of the indy blogosphere.</p>
<p>Dalegacy</p>
<p>DVJ reborn. I love your lakers this year though. Bynum is the real deal. He puts Curry to shame rehabing and improving to help take the Lake show back to the title.</p>
<p>Night all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knicksdefense</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24445</link>
		<dc:creator>knicksdefense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24445</guid>
		<description>i read about that trade, they want lee instead, which makes no sense to me because they already have a david lee clone in andres biedrins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read about that trade, they want lee instead, which makes no sense to me because they already have a david lee clone in andres biedrins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulNoize</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24444</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulNoize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24444</guid>
		<description>i think Curry for Harrington is a steal for the Knicks.  i can&#039;t think of a single reason why GS would do it or even consider it, Al&#039;s a stud and Curry is a bum.

Seems like one of O&amp;B&#039;s or DLT&#039;s &quot;homer&quot; trades to me.  Maybe if we throw in a second round draft pick they&#039;ll add Steven Jackson too, LOL!  =)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Curry for Harrington is a steal for the Knicks.  i can&#8217;t think of a single reason why GS would do it or even consider it, Al&#8217;s a stud and Curry is a bum.</p>
<p>Seems like one of O&amp;B&#8217;s or DLT&#8217;s &#8220;homer&#8221; trades to me.  Maybe if we throw in a second round draft pick they&#8217;ll add Steven Jackson too, LOL!  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thelegacy</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24442</link>
		<dc:creator>thelegacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24442</guid>
		<description>Hey guys.. great to start off the season with a win.. and amidst all these trade rumors.. what do you guys think of the eddy curry al harrington swap? Considering that eddy is gonna be useless to us all season.. just thinking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys.. great to start off the season with a win.. and amidst all these trade rumors.. what do you guys think of the eddy curry al harrington swap? Considering that eddy is gonna be useless to us all season.. just thinking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knicksdefense</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24428</link>
		<dc:creator>knicksdefense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24428</guid>
		<description>nice to see the team sharing the ball, playing together and making shots.  this was the first time I saw duhon in a knicks jersey.  i kept thinking about chris childs who was the same size and wore #1 for the knicks in the 90&#039;s.

i was surprised miami didn&#039;t put up more of a fight.  

gallo didn&#039;t do much, as I expected, but marbury with zero minutes, well, how long will it take for the next locker room tirade?

nate impressed me tonight with his passing abilities.  didn&#039;t think he was tall enough to be a good passer but he did make some good ones last night.

7 seconds or less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice to see the team sharing the ball, playing together and making shots.  this was the first time I saw duhon in a knicks jersey.  i kept thinking about chris childs who was the same size and wore #1 for the knicks in the 90&#8242;s.</p>
<p>i was surprised miami didn&#8217;t put up more of a fight.  </p>
<p>gallo didn&#8217;t do much, as I expected, but marbury with zero minutes, well, how long will it take for the next locker room tirade?</p>
<p>nate impressed me tonight with his passing abilities.  didn&#8217;t think he was tall enough to be a good passer but he did make some good ones last night.</p>
<p>7 seconds or less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed drossman</title>
		<link>http://www.knicksdefense.com/2008/10/29/about-dan-time/comment-page-1/#comment-24427</link>
		<dc:creator>ed drossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knicksdefense.com/?p=557#comment-24427</guid>
		<description>No Isiah Thomas on the bench, no Marbury on the court, Knicks win.  This is a work in progress, but at least they won.  Last year they would have lost this type of game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Isiah Thomas on the bench, no Marbury on the court, Knicks win.  This is a work in progress, but at least they won.  Last year they would have lost this type of game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

